https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241100 The judges upheld the lower authority's decision that the imported goods should be classified under 3401.19 for duty calculation based on Maximum Retail Price (MRP), rather than under 3401.11 as claimed by the appellant. The duty demand was confirmed, and the penalty imposition was not contested by the appellant, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 22 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:10:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241100 The judges upheld the lower authority's decision that the imported goods should be classified under 3401.19 for duty calculation based on Maximum Retail Price (MRP), rather than under 3401.11 as claimed by the appellant. The duty demand was confirmed, and the penalty imposition was not contested by the appellant, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241100