<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 758 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241093</link>
    <description>The judgment acknowledged delays in informing the appellant about defective rebate claims and failure to review documents promptly. It highlighted the disallowance of interest for processing delays and emphasized compliance with Central Excise guidelines. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, directing the grant of interest for delays caused by the department due to non-compliance with prescribed time frames and procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:09:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 758 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241093</link>
      <description>The judgment acknowledged delays in informing the appellant about defective rebate claims and failure to review documents promptly. It highlighted the disallowance of interest for processing delays and emphasized compliance with Central Excise guidelines. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, directing the grant of interest for delays caused by the department due to non-compliance with prescribed time frames and procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>