<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1245 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160365</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the assessing authority to determine the classification of goods under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, while permitting the petitioner to present arguments supporting their classification under entry 2-A. The Court directed the assessing authority to decide on the assessability of turnovers and quashed the assessment order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer. It invoked its power of superintendence under article 227 of the Constitution to intervene and instructed the authorities to determine tax liability based on the classification of goods, without expressing an opinion on the factual controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1245 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160365</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the assessing authority to determine the classification of goods under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, while permitting the petitioner to present arguments supporting their classification under entry 2-A. The Court directed the assessing authority to decide on the assessability of turnovers and quashed the assessment order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer. It invoked its power of superintendence under article 227 of the Constitution to intervene and instructed the authorities to determine tax liability based on the classification of goods, without expressing an opinion on the factual controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>