<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 653 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160358</link>
    <description>Crushing and grinding marble stones into marble powder was held to fall within the expansive inclusive definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; in section 2(j) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the process prepared goods for marketability even though it did not create a commercially new article. The Court applied the statutory wording and prior authorities to reject the narrower common-law meaning of manufacture. On that basis, refusal to issue the eligibility certificate was unsustainable, the impugned order was quashed, and the respondent was directed to grant the certificate and consequential exemption according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 653 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160358</link>
      <description>Crushing and grinding marble stones into marble powder was held to fall within the expansive inclusive definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; in section 2(j) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the process prepared goods for marketability even though it did not create a commercially new article. The Court applied the statutory wording and prior authorities to reject the narrower common-law meaning of manufacture. On that basis, refusal to issue the eligibility certificate was unsustainable, the impugned order was quashed, and the respondent was directed to grant the certificate and consequential exemption according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>