https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160353 Preventive detention was held invalid where copies of documents referred to and relied upon in the grounds of detention were not supplied to the detenu, because effective representation requires access to the material forming the basis of subjective satisfaction. An explanation for non-supply could not replace the documents themselves. As a valid detention order was a condition precedent for action under the forfeiture statute, the invalidity of the detention order also rendered the downstream notice and forfeiture proceedings unsustainable. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 08:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160353 Preventive detention was held invalid where copies of documents referred to and relied upon in the grounds of detention were not supplied to the detenu, because effective representation requires access to the material forming the basis of subjective satisfaction. An explanation for non-supply could not replace the documents themselves. As a valid detention order was a condition precedent for action under the forfeiture statute, the invalidity of the detention order also rendered the downstream notice and forfeiture proceedings unsustainable. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 23 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160353