<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 704 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to SEBI for reconsideration within three months, emphasizing the significant improvements in the Company&#039;s performance post-capital infusion and urging SEBI to prevent financial distress. Adjudication proceedings were to proceed independently, with SEBI retaining the right to impose penalties if violations were confirmed. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 704 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to SEBI for reconsideration within three months, emphasizing the significant improvements in the Company&#039;s performance post-capital infusion and urging SEBI to prevent financial distress. Adjudication proceedings were to proceed independently, with SEBI retaining the right to impose penalties if violations were confirmed. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>