<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 588 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160323</link>
    <description>Post-Forty-sixth Amendment, transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract is taxable as a deemed sale under article 366(29-A)(b), and the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act similarly treats such transfers within the definition of sale. On the contractual terms, supply of pipes formed a separable part of the arrangement; in any event, even if the contract were treated as indivisible, the goods component remained taxable. For the relevant period, the prevailing notification governed the tax rate on the value of goods involved in the works contract, and tax deducted at source at 2% was only adjustable against the assessed liability. The assessment sustaining sales tax on the goods component was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:22:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 588 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160323</link>
      <description>Post-Forty-sixth Amendment, transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract is taxable as a deemed sale under article 366(29-A)(b), and the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act similarly treats such transfers within the definition of sale. On the contractual terms, supply of pipes formed a separable part of the arrangement; in any event, even if the contract were treated as indivisible, the goods component remained taxable. For the relevant period, the prevailing notification governed the tax rate on the value of goods involved in the works contract, and tax deducted at source at 2% was only adjustable against the assessed liability. The assessment sustaining sales tax on the goods component was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>