<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 656 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160322</link>
    <description>The exclusion of ginger from the sales tax exemption for vegetables under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 was upheld as a valid fiscal classification, since the Legislature could choose which goods to exempt and wide latitude applies in tax classification unless it is manifestly unreasonable or arbitrary. The specific exception of ginger, onion, garlic, spices and condiments from the exempt category was therefore not violative of article 14. The argument based on article 286 did not invalidate the levy, because any dispute as to whether the sales occurred outside the State was a factual matter for the taxing authority, not a ground to strike down the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 656 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160322</link>
      <description>The exclusion of ginger from the sales tax exemption for vegetables under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 was upheld as a valid fiscal classification, since the Legislature could choose which goods to exempt and wide latitude applies in tax classification unless it is manifestly unreasonable or arbitrary. The specific exception of ginger, onion, garlic, spices and condiments from the exempt category was therefore not violative of article 14. The argument based on article 286 did not invalidate the levy, because any dispute as to whether the sales occurred outside the State was a factual matter for the taxing authority, not a ground to strike down the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>