<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 627 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160318</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 could be initiated only on the basis of information leading the authority to form satisfaction that turnover had escaped assessment, and only by a notice in the prescribed form disclosing that statutory basis and the proposal to reopen under section 19(1) read with section 17(2) and rule 20. Notices that merely referred to an audit objection and required appearance, without recording the requisite satisfaction or citing the reassessment provision, were held to be jurisdictionally defective. The Patna HC therefore treated the reassessment proceeding as invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 627 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160318</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 could be initiated only on the basis of information leading the authority to form satisfaction that turnover had escaped assessment, and only by a notice in the prescribed form disclosing that statutory basis and the proposal to reopen under section 19(1) read with section 17(2) and rule 20. Notices that merely referred to an audit objection and required appearance, without recording the requisite satisfaction or citing the reassessment provision, were held to be jurisdictionally defective. The Patna HC therefore treated the reassessment proceeding as invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>