https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241020 The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived for the appeal hearing after compliance. Regarding the classification issue, the Tribunal ruled that the goods did not qualify as printed books, brochures, or leaflets, requiring the applicants to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty due to the lack of substantiation for a complete waiver. This case emphasizes the importance of accurate tariff classification and adherence to procedural requirements for duty pre-deposit waivers in excise cases. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241020 The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived for the appeal hearing after compliance. Regarding the classification issue, the Tribunal ruled that the goods did not qualify as printed books, brochures, or leaflets, requiring the applicants to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty due to the lack of substantiation for a complete waiver. This case emphasizes the importance of accurate tariff classification and adherence to procedural requirements for duty pre-deposit waivers in excise cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241020