<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 683 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in CCE vs. Accurate Meters Ltd., ruling that freight charges should not be included in the assessable value of goods under the Central Excise Act. The applicants&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty was upheld, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents in tax law interpretation and application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 683 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in CCE vs. Accurate Meters Ltd., ruling that freight charges should not be included in the assessable value of goods under the Central Excise Act. The applicants&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty was upheld, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents in tax law interpretation and application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>