<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 682 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241017</link>
    <description>Notification No. 83/94-CE was held unavailable because the goods manufactured did not fall within the notification&#039;s specified tariff entries. The exemption could not be claimed merely on the basis of an undertaking given by the raw material supplier, and the cited precedent was found inapplicable on the facts. As the job work activity was already within the department&#039;s knowledge, the demand was restricted to the normal period; duty and consequential interest were sustained, while penalty was not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 682 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241017</link>
      <description>Notification No. 83/94-CE was held unavailable because the goods manufactured did not fall within the notification&#039;s specified tariff entries. The exemption could not be claimed merely on the basis of an undertaking given by the raw material supplier, and the cited precedent was found inapplicable on the facts. As the job work activity was already within the department&#039;s knowledge, the demand was restricted to the normal period; duty and consequential interest were sustained, while penalty was not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>