https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241009 The Tribunal, comprising P K Das and Mathew John, JJ., held that the 2008 amendment to the definition of "excisable goods" did not alter the Supreme Court's ruling that cinders produced during the manufacturing of refractory bricks are not subject to excise duty. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the collection of the amount pending appeal, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:32:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241009 The Tribunal, comprising P K Das and Mathew John, JJ., held that the 2008 amendment to the definition of "excisable goods" did not alter the Supreme Court's ruling that cinders produced during the manufacturing of refractory bricks are not subject to excise duty. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the collection of the amount pending appeal, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241009