https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241003 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the characterization of cutting and slitting of jumbo rolls of plastic, aluminium, and paper as manufacture. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal held that these processes did not alter the products significantly to constitute manufacture. The judgment emphasized the significance of legal precedent in interpreting manufacturing activities under the applicable laws. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:31:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241003 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the characterization of cutting and slitting of jumbo rolls of plastic, aluminium, and paper as manufacture. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal held that these processes did not alter the products significantly to constitute manufacture. The judgment emphasized the significance of legal precedent in interpreting manufacturing activities under the applicable laws. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241003