<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 654 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240989</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata bench upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.1,04,06,000/- under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act related to outstanding liabilities towards creditors. The bench found no justification for interference, confirming the deletion and emphasizing the need for concrete evidence and adherence to legal provisions in assessing cessation of liability to prevent unjustified tax additions based on presumptions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 654 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240989</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata bench upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.1,04,06,000/- under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act related to outstanding liabilities towards creditors. The bench found no justification for interference, confirming the deletion and emphasizing the need for concrete evidence and adherence to legal provisions in assessing cessation of liability to prevent unjustified tax additions based on presumptions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>