<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240980</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the CIT&#039;s direction for a denovo assessment lacked justification. The ITAT found the assessment order, based on a scientific allocation of expenses, to be proper. The ITAT quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, emphasizing the validity of the original assessment. The doctrine of merger was considered academically due to the quashing of the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240980</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the CIT&#039;s direction for a denovo assessment lacked justification. The ITAT found the assessment order, based on a scientific allocation of expenses, to be proper. The ITAT quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, emphasizing the validity of the original assessment. The doctrine of merger was considered academically due to the quashing of the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>