<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 936 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160310</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial sales tax authority could not sustain a fresh provisional assessment under section 5-A for a period already covered by a binding appellate order granting relief on the same levy. The Court held that the earlier appellate determination had to be respected within the same statutory framework, and the same liability could not be revived for the covered turnover. It also found that resort to provisional assessment after more than two years, when the assessment year had long expired, was unjustified. For these reasons, the provisional assessment was set aside in full and the matter was remitted for final assessment according to law after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:34:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 936 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160310</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial sales tax authority could not sustain a fresh provisional assessment under section 5-A for a period already covered by a binding appellate order granting relief on the same levy. The Court held that the earlier appellate determination had to be respected within the same statutory framework, and the same liability could not be revived for the covered turnover. It also found that resort to provisional assessment after more than two years, when the assessment year had long expired, was unjustified. For these reasons, the provisional assessment was set aside in full and the matter was remitted for final assessment according to law after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>