<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 848 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160294</link>
    <description>Excise duty paid by the purchasing corporation on Indian-made foreign liquor, under the bonded warehouse scheme, was treated as a statutory liability arising only after the goods had passed from the manufacturer. On that basis, the duty was not part of the manufacturer&#039;s sale price or bargain and could not be included in turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The same reasoning also undermined penalty proceedings based on non-inclusion of that duty in returns, because the chargeable turnover did not comprise the excise duty element. The note distinguishes situations where duty remains a burden on the manufacturer and collection is merely postponed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 848 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160294</link>
      <description>Excise duty paid by the purchasing corporation on Indian-made foreign liquor, under the bonded warehouse scheme, was treated as a statutory liability arising only after the goods had passed from the manufacturer. On that basis, the duty was not part of the manufacturer&#039;s sale price or bargain and could not be included in turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The same reasoning also undermined penalty proceedings based on non-inclusion of that duty in returns, because the chargeable turnover did not comprise the excise duty element. The note distinguishes situations where duty remains a burden on the manufacturer and collection is merely postponed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>