<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 603 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240938</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by a Company against the disallowance of brokerage paid on cotton purchases for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal upheld some disallowances, remanded others for verification, and declined interference in certain cases. The main issue was the genuineness of transactions and brokerage disallowance. Despite confirmations, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding the payments not genuine brokerage fees due to close connections between recipients and the Company&#039;s Directors. The judgment emphasizes the need for substantial evidence beyond mere confirmations to validate transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 603 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240938</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by a Company against the disallowance of brokerage paid on cotton purchases for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal upheld some disallowances, remanded others for verification, and declined interference in certain cases. The main issue was the genuineness of transactions and brokerage disallowance. Despite confirmations, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding the payments not genuine brokerage fees due to close connections between recipients and the Company&#039;s Directors. The judgment emphasizes the need for substantial evidence beyond mere confirmations to validate transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>