<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 584 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s order and dismissed the appeal, stating that the proposed method did not comply with the minimum public shareholding requirement and did not ensure a dispersed shareholding structure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining public participation in listed companies to prevent market manipulation. The appeal was deemed meritless, and the interim relief granted earlier was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 584 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s order and dismissed the appeal, stating that the proposed method did not comply with the minimum public shareholding requirement and did not ensure a dispersed shareholding structure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining public participation in listed companies to prevent market manipulation. The appeal was deemed meritless, and the interim relief granted earlier was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>