<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 571 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240906</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the cost of freight should not be included in the assessable value for the supply of goods to the electricity board based on the distinct contractual arrangements and the precedent set by the Apex Court in a relevant case. The tribunal emphasized the importance of analyzing the specific terms of the contracts and applying the relevant legal principles to determine the assessable value in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 571 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240906</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the cost of freight should not be included in the assessable value for the supply of goods to the electricity board based on the distinct contractual arrangements and the precedent set by the Apex Court in a relevant case. The tribunal emphasized the importance of analyzing the specific terms of the contracts and applying the relevant legal principles to determine the assessable value in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>