https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240905 The appellant sought waiver and stay for a demand on certain products arising during the manufacture of 'Refined Rice Bran Oil'. The demand was based on denial of exemption under Notification No. 89/95 CE. The Bench noted previous relief granted to the appellant in a similar case. The appellant referenced a representation to CBEC for a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act. Considering ongoing surveys and potential future notifications, no pre-deposit was required under Section 35F. The stay application was allowed in light of the Board's position on recovery during surveys under Section 11C. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240905 The appellant sought waiver and stay for a demand on certain products arising during the manufacture of 'Refined Rice Bran Oil'. The demand was based on denial of exemption under Notification No. 89/95 CE. The Bench noted previous relief granted to the appellant in a similar case. The appellant referenced a representation to CBEC for a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act. Considering ongoing surveys and potential future notifications, no pre-deposit was required under Section 35F. The stay application was allowed in light of the Board's position on recovery during surveys under Section 11C. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240905