<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160273</link>
    <description>Freight and delivery charges were excluded from the taxable turnover because section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 treats such charges as outside the sale price when separately charged. Although the bills first showed an aggregate figure and then deducted freight and delivery before tax computation, the factual finding was that tax was collected only on the amount net of those charges. The addition to turnover was therefore disallowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160273</link>
      <description>Freight and delivery charges were excluded from the taxable turnover because section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 treats such charges as outside the sale price when separately charged. Although the bills first showed an aggregate figure and then deducted freight and delivery before tax computation, the factual finding was that tax was collected only on the amount net of those charges. The addition to turnover was therefore disallowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>