<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 508 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160264</link>
    <description>Sales of printed material prepared to publishers&#039; specifications were not treated as exempt sales of reading books under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax notification, because the assessee supplied printing materials on a paper-and-printing charge basis rather than compiling or selling reading books as such; the turnover was therefore taxable and assessment on that amount stood restored. Penalty under section 12(5)(iii) read with section 9(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act was not attracted, since the assessee had disclosed the transactions in the return and merely claimed part of the turnover as exempt, so the return was not incorrect or incomplete in the statutory sense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:02:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 508 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160264</link>
      <description>Sales of printed material prepared to publishers&#039; specifications were not treated as exempt sales of reading books under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax notification, because the assessee supplied printing materials on a paper-and-printing charge basis rather than compiling or selling reading books as such; the turnover was therefore taxable and assessment on that amount stood restored. Penalty under section 12(5)(iii) read with section 9(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act was not attracted, since the assessee had disclosed the transactions in the return and merely claimed part of the turnover as exempt, so the return was not incorrect or incomplete in the statutory sense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>