<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 567 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240902</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available against a sales tax assessment, the aggrieved party must ordinarily pursue that remedy and raise all factual and legal objections before the appellate forum. The High Court will not ordinarily exercise writ jurisdiction to examine disputed assessment issues in such circumstances. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was rejected for failure to exhaust the alternate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 567 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240902</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available against a sales tax assessment, the aggrieved party must ordinarily pursue that remedy and raise all factual and legal objections before the appellate forum. The High Court will not ordinarily exercise writ jurisdiction to examine disputed assessment issues in such circumstances. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was rejected for failure to exhaust the alternate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>