<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 562 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240897</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed the demand of service tax and penalties against the applicant for wireline logging services categorized under technical testing and analysis service. The demand was upheld for the period September 2004 to March 2008. The appellant&#039;s argument of the demand being time-barred due to services provided until May 31, 2007 was rejected. The tribunal granted the stay petition based on a similar case precedent, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 562 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240897</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed the demand of service tax and penalties against the applicant for wireline logging services categorized under technical testing and analysis service. The demand was upheld for the period September 2004 to March 2008. The appellant&#039;s argument of the demand being time-barred due to services provided until May 31, 2007 was rejected. The tribunal granted the stay petition based on a similar case precedent, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>