<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 561 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the stay petition, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal to proceed without making a pre-deposit. It emphasized considering both the case merits and time-bar issue in determining service tax liability for providing employees on deputation to group companies. The Tribunal held that no deposit was required at the prima facie stage, linking the appeal with the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the same order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 561 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the stay petition, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal to proceed without making a pre-deposit. It emphasized considering both the case merits and time-bar issue in determining service tax liability for providing employees on deputation to group companies. The Tribunal held that no deposit was required at the prima facie stage, linking the appeal with the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the same order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>