<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 533 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240868</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s computation of depreciation, disallowance of interest on borrowings, and exclusion of excise duty from total turnover. However, it directed the AO to reexamine the exclusion of DEPB from eligible profits for deduction u/s 80HHC in line with a Supreme Court judgment, allowing the department&#039;s appeal in part and the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 533 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240868</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s computation of depreciation, disallowance of interest on borrowings, and exclusion of excise duty from total turnover. However, it directed the AO to reexamine the exclusion of DEPB from eligible profits for deduction u/s 80HHC in line with a Supreme Court judgment, allowing the department&#039;s appeal in part and the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>