<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240867</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 5,56,839/- made on account of on money received by the assessee. The ITAT emphasized the lack of concrete evidence against the assessee and procedural irregularities in initiating proceedings under section 158BD. The judgment stressed the importance of adhering to legal procedures and requiring substantial evidence before making additions in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240867</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 5,56,839/- made on account of on money received by the assessee. The ITAT emphasized the lack of concrete evidence against the assessee and procedural irregularities in initiating proceedings under section 158BD. The judgment stressed the importance of adhering to legal procedures and requiring substantial evidence before making additions in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>