https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240857 Export goods bearing a trade-name reference were not shown to be prohibited, because the markings only indicated suitability for a particular vehicle brand and did not establish manufacture by the trade-mark owner. The false trade mark notification was confined to imports and did not extend to exports. The special order invoked by the Revenue applied only to specified imported or India-processed goods, while its exemption covered goods made or manufactured in India solely for export. No material showed that the goods fell outside that exemption or that any other export prohibition applied, so the Revenue's challenge failed. en-us Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240857 Export goods bearing a trade-name reference were not shown to be prohibited, because the markings only indicated suitability for a particular vehicle brand and did not establish manufacture by the trade-mark owner. The false trade mark notification was confined to imports and did not extend to exports. The special order invoked by the Revenue applied only to specified imported or India-processed goods, while its exemption covered goods made or manufactured in India solely for export. No material showed that the goods fell outside that exemption or that any other export prohibition applied, so the Revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240857