<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a demand against the applicant for using power in the process of frame filling for manufacturing matches. The Tribunal found that factual evidence, including electrical connections, power consumption patterns, and admissions by the appellant, supported the conclusion that power was indeed used. The Tribunal also determined that the applicant&#039;s arguments regarding rectification of mistakes were unfounded and confirmed the demand for duty and interest for the relevant period, partially allowing the application by dropping the demand and penalty for a specific period but confirming it for the subsequent period with appropriate penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a demand against the applicant for using power in the process of frame filling for manufacturing matches. The Tribunal found that factual evidence, including electrical connections, power consumption patterns, and admissions by the appellant, supported the conclusion that power was indeed used. The Tribunal also determined that the applicant&#039;s arguments regarding rectification of mistakes were unfounded and confirmed the demand for duty and interest for the relevant period, partially allowing the application by dropping the demand and penalty for a specific period but confirming it for the subsequent period with appropriate penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>