<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 514 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation charges, subject to fulfilling specified conditions. Additionally, it clarified the limitations on the Commissioner (Appeals) authority to remand a case, directing a fresh examination by the lower adjudicating authority while ensuring a fair hearing for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 514 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation charges, subject to fulfilling specified conditions. Additionally, it clarified the limitations on the Commissioner (Appeals) authority to remand a case, directing a fresh examination by the lower adjudicating authority while ensuring a fair hearing for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>