<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 512 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240847</link>
    <description>Conditional exemption for naphtha supplied against international competitive bidding remained available where the supplier satisfied the prescribed pre-clearance concessional-duty requirements at removal. The supplier was not liable for differential duty merely because the buyer later used part of the goods otherwise than for manufacture of fertilizers, as end-use compliance was a post-clearance obligation of the user manufacturer. On that footing, no duty demand could be fastened on the supplier, and the penalty also could not survive once the duty demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 512 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240847</link>
      <description>Conditional exemption for naphtha supplied against international competitive bidding remained available where the supplier satisfied the prescribed pre-clearance concessional-duty requirements at removal. The supplier was not liable for differential duty merely because the buyer later used part of the goods otherwise than for manufacture of fertilizers, as end-use compliance was a post-clearance obligation of the user manufacturer. On that footing, no duty demand could be fastened on the supplier, and the penalty also could not survive once the duty demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>