<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 844 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160252</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed Central Sales Tax dues cannot be levied by importing the State sales tax interest provisions through sections 9(2) and 9(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act unless the Central statute itself provides a substantive charging basis. By contrast, an interim writ order allowing payment in two stages was treated as an ad hoc arrangement to lift attachment and continue business, not as a statutory instalment order under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. Accordingly, interest on the Central Sales Tax demand was not leviable on that basis, while interest under the State sales tax law was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 844 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160252</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed Central Sales Tax dues cannot be levied by importing the State sales tax interest provisions through sections 9(2) and 9(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act unless the Central statute itself provides a substantive charging basis. By contrast, an interim writ order allowing payment in two stages was treated as an ad hoc arrangement to lift attachment and continue business, not as a statutory instalment order under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. Accordingly, interest on the Central Sales Tax demand was not leviable on that basis, while interest under the State sales tax law was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>