<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 595 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160243</link>
    <description>Rule 52 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules required a mandatory hierarchy for service of pre-assessment notice: where the dealer&#039;s address was known, service by registered post had to be attempted before resorting to affixture. Because no registered-post attempt was made and the notice was merely affixed after the shop was found closed, service was invalid. As the notice was not properly served, the assessee was denied a real opportunity to file objections, and the assessment founded on that defective service was unsustainable. The assessment was annulled and the matter was directed to proceed afresh after proper service and an opportunity to object.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 595 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160243</link>
      <description>Rule 52 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules required a mandatory hierarchy for service of pre-assessment notice: where the dealer&#039;s address was known, service by registered post had to be attempted before resorting to affixture. Because no registered-post attempt was made and the notice was merely affixed after the shop was found closed, service was invalid. As the notice was not properly served, the assessee was denied a real opportunity to file objections, and the assessment founded on that defective service was unsustainable. The assessment was annulled and the matter was directed to proceed afresh after proper service and an opportunity to object.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>