<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 467 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160221</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 55(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held valid where the assessee had been given notice, filed no objection, and the corrections only restored the correct deferral period and tax rate without enhancing assessment or penalty. The proviso requiring a reasonable opportunity of hearing applied only where rectification has the effect of enhancement, so no personal hearing was necessary on these facts. Section 55(4) also preserved the ordinary appellate and revisional remedies against a rectification order. The challenge to the rectification therefore failed, and the orders were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 467 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160221</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 55(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held valid where the assessee had been given notice, filed no objection, and the corrections only restored the correct deferral period and tax rate without enhancing assessment or penalty. The proviso requiring a reasonable opportunity of hearing applied only where rectification has the effect of enhancement, so no personal hearing was necessary on these facts. Section 55(4) also preserved the ordinary appellate and revisional remedies against a rectification order. The challenge to the rectification therefore failed, and the orders were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>