<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240835</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to withdraw the freezing letter upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the balance amount of alleged Service Tax default. The petitioner was allowed to choose the bank for the guarantee, subject to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. The court instructed the respondents to issue a show cause notice by a specified date and complete adjudication proceedings promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240835</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to withdraw the freezing letter upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the balance amount of alleged Service Tax default. The petitioner was allowed to choose the bank for the guarantee, subject to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. The court instructed the respondents to issue a show cause notice by a specified date and complete adjudication proceedings promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>