<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 471 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240806</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the matter to be restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of fair play and natural justice, highlighting the lack of opportunity for the assessee to substantiate claims. The Assessing Officer was instructed to allow the assessee a fair opportunity to present evidence and re-decide the issue of agricultural income after providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of due process in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 471 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240806</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the matter to be restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of fair play and natural justice, highlighting the lack of opportunity for the assessee to substantiate claims. The Assessing Officer was instructed to allow the assessee a fair opportunity to present evidence and re-decide the issue of agricultural income after providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of due process in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>