<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 465 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that if the entire business/contract receipts received by a Joint Venture (JV) are transferred to the constituent members/JV, there is no accrual of income in the hands of the assessee-JV. However, if any portion of contract receipts is retained by the JV, it should be taxed in the assessee&#039;s hands. The Assessing Officer was directed to reverify accounts accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that assessment orders for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 were null and void due to being issued beyond the statutory time limit. The assessee&#039;s appeals for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08 were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 465 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that if the entire business/contract receipts received by a Joint Venture (JV) are transferred to the constituent members/JV, there is no accrual of income in the hands of the assessee-JV. However, if any portion of contract receipts is retained by the JV, it should be taxed in the assessee&#039;s hands. The Assessing Officer was directed to reverify accounts accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that assessment orders for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 were null and void due to being issued beyond the statutory time limit. The assessee&#039;s appeals for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08 were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>