<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 707 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160217</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 45(1)(i) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to mistakes apparent from the record and could not be used to revisit the merits of an earlier revision order. A change of view on the rate of set-off, where the issue was legally disputed and supported by rival authorities, was not an obvious clerical or record error. The Additional Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to withdraw the earlier set-off order and substitute a different view. The rectification order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 707 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160217</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 45(1)(i) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to mistakes apparent from the record and could not be used to revisit the merits of an earlier revision order. A change of view on the rate of set-off, where the issue was legally disputed and supported by rival authorities, was not an obvious clerical or record error. The Additional Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to withdraw the earlier set-off order and substitute a different view. The rectification order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>