<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 840 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160209</link>
    <description>Cotton transactions between a Maharashtra federation and Tamil Nadu mills were analysed under section 3(a) and section 4 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the deeming rule in Explanation 3 to section 2(n) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The decisive question was whether the movement of goods from Maharashtra to Tamil Nadu was occasioned by the sale contract. On the stated facts, the offer, confirmation, specification of goods, despatch instructions and movement of identified bales showed that the interstate movement arose from the contract itself. Storage, insurance, title-retention and resale clauses were treated as ancillary, so the transactions were treated as inter-State sales rather than local sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 840 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160209</link>
      <description>Cotton transactions between a Maharashtra federation and Tamil Nadu mills were analysed under section 3(a) and section 4 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the deeming rule in Explanation 3 to section 2(n) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The decisive question was whether the movement of goods from Maharashtra to Tamil Nadu was occasioned by the sale contract. On the stated facts, the offer, confirmation, specification of goods, despatch instructions and movement of identified bales showed that the interstate movement arose from the contract itself. Storage, insurance, title-retention and resale clauses were treated as ancillary, so the transactions were treated as inter-State sales rather than local sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>