<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 954 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160197</link>
    <description>A retiring partner remains jointly and severally liable for sales tax and other dues under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 unless the prescribed retirement intimation is given. Where the firm is not dissolved, Rule 5(8)(b) requires the partner to file Form 3 with the registering authority within 30 days of retirement, along with the retirement deed. The court treated compliance with that statutory mode as necessary for the revenue to recognize retirement, and held that reference to other documents was insufficient. On the record, no such intimation had been given, so the retirement claim could not displace liability and the revisions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 954 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160197</link>
      <description>A retiring partner remains jointly and severally liable for sales tax and other dues under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 unless the prescribed retirement intimation is given. Where the firm is not dissolved, Rule 5(8)(b) requires the partner to file Form 3 with the registering authority within 30 days of retirement, along with the retirement deed. The court treated compliance with that statutory mode as necessary for the revenue to recognize retirement, and held that reference to other documents was insufficient. On the record, no such intimation had been given, so the retirement claim could not displace liability and the revisions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>