<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 639 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160188</link>
    <description>The Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present evidence on whether the powdered forms of chilli and coriander are commercially distinct from their whole counterparts. The Court emphasized the need for evidence to establish commercial distinction rather than relying solely on theoretical tests. The judgment set a precedent highlighting the importance of evidence in determining whether a transformation process results in commercially distinct goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 639 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160188</link>
      <description>The Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present evidence on whether the powdered forms of chilli and coriander are commercially distinct from their whole counterparts. The Court emphasized the need for evidence to establish commercial distinction rather than relying solely on theoretical tests. The judgment set a precedent highlighting the importance of evidence in determining whether a transformation process results in commercially distinct goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>