<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 838 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160187</link>
    <description>Locally purchased defective coils, end cuttings and rejected steel materials that were merely segregated and sold without any manufacturing process could not be taxed again where tax had already been paid at purchase. The court distinguished such items from manufactured commodities, holding that the rule on different commercial products arising out of manufacture did not apply because there was no transformation of the goods. However, the denial of set-off was sustained on the footing that no manufacturing activity was undertaken in relation to those items. The matter was remitted for exclusion of the relevant local purchases from the tax computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 838 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160187</link>
      <description>Locally purchased defective coils, end cuttings and rejected steel materials that were merely segregated and sold without any manufacturing process could not be taxed again where tax had already been paid at purchase. The court distinguished such items from manufactured commodities, holding that the rule on different commercial products arising out of manufacture did not apply because there was no transformation of the goods. However, the denial of set-off was sustained on the footing that no manufacturing activity was undertaken in relation to those items. The matter was remitted for exclusion of the relevant local purchases from the tax computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>