<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 802 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160186</link>
    <description>A subsisting eligibility certificate issued under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 binds the taxing authorities, and the Sales Tax Officer cannot ignore it or conduct a fresh enquiry into the facts on which it was granted. Any cancellation can be made only by the authority empowered under the statute and in the prescribed manner; until then, assessment and demand based on disregarding the certificate are without jurisdiction. The existence of an alternative remedy under section 9 does not bar writ jurisdiction where the impugned action is wholly without jurisdiction. The notice and consequential assessment orders were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:08:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 802 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160186</link>
      <description>A subsisting eligibility certificate issued under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 binds the taxing authorities, and the Sales Tax Officer cannot ignore it or conduct a fresh enquiry into the facts on which it was granted. Any cancellation can be made only by the authority empowered under the statute and in the prescribed manner; until then, assessment and demand based on disregarding the certificate are without jurisdiction. The existence of an alternative remedy under section 9 does not bar writ jurisdiction where the impugned action is wholly without jurisdiction. The notice and consequential assessment orders were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>