https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160171 Review jurisdiction in writ proceedings is limited to recognised grounds, including discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous grounds, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or correct an alleged appellate error. Non-consideration of documents already on the record did not justify review where those documents were not relied on in the writ proceedings. A procedural objection that more than one writ petition should have been filed also did not amount to a reviewable error. The review was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and the order granting it was unsustainable. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160171 Review jurisdiction in writ proceedings is limited to recognised grounds, including discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous grounds, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or correct an alleged appellate error. Non-consideration of documents already on the record did not justify review where those documents were not relied on in the writ proceedings. A procedural objection that more than one writ petition should have been filed also did not amount to a reviewable error. The review was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and the order granting it was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160171