<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240775</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit should not be denied on a purely technical defect where debit notes and annexures, read together, contain the required particulars and the receipt and use of the input service are otherwise established. The document requirements under the Service Tax and CENVAT rules are meant to verify tax payment and service receipt, not to impose a rigid single-page format. Centralised registration of the office handling billing and accounting is sufficient where the service tax rules permit it, and individual premises used to render services do not need separate registration. On that basis, the credit objection and related demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240775</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit should not be denied on a purely technical defect where debit notes and annexures, read together, contain the required particulars and the receipt and use of the input service are otherwise established. The document requirements under the Service Tax and CENVAT rules are meant to verify tax payment and service receipt, not to impose a rigid single-page format. Centralised registration of the office handling billing and accounting is sufficient where the service tax rules permit it, and individual premises used to render services do not need separate registration. On that basis, the credit objection and related demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>