<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240772</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity to determine the correct consideration received by the service provider, extend the cum duty tax benefit, and ensure the imposition of penalties in accordance with the law and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240772</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity to determine the correct consideration received by the service provider, extend the cum duty tax benefit, and ensure the imposition of penalties in accordance with the law and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>