https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240756 The court found that the notices and attachment order issued by the Tax Recovery Officer lacked proper justification and jurisdiction, leading to unauthorized harassment of the petitioner. The court concluded that the actions were without jurisdiction, setting aside the notices and restraining further proceedings against the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed with costs, directing any recovery efforts to be pursued against Smt. Vaijanti Gupta in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240756 The court found that the notices and attachment order issued by the Tax Recovery Officer lacked proper justification and jurisdiction, leading to unauthorized harassment of the petitioner. The court concluded that the actions were without jurisdiction, setting aside the notices and restraining further proceedings against the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed with costs, directing any recovery efforts to be pursued against Smt. Vaijanti Gupta in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240756