<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 418 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240753</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, affirming that delivery-based transactions constituted short-term capital gains due to an investment motive, while F &amp;amp; O transactions and daily trading in shares were classified as business income. The Court found no legal basis to overturn the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 418 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240753</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, affirming that delivery-based transactions constituted short-term capital gains due to an investment motive, while F &amp;amp; O transactions and daily trading in shares were classified as business income. The Court found no legal basis to overturn the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>